5-week-old foster child dies at DYFS office -
Officials in Newark suspect reaction to vaccination ~Story
Shattered Dreams: A year ago, Mecklenburg County Department of Youth and Family Services took the ten children of Jack And Kathy Stratton from them. What happened over the next twelve months included allegations of sexual abuse in a foster home, gag orders to keep the Str... ~Story
CPS = Child Protective Services
(It's actually the exact opposite)
When the Inquisitions were in full swing and were protected and legal under the law of the land, accusations could be made against another by anonymous sources. That person accused would then be questioned by the office of inquisition. Usually torture would be used to make the person confess to the accusations.
This system was such an oppressive situation that when anyone righteous came to power they would make laws to protect the people from such injustices.
The same thing was done in the U.S.A by our founding fathers through the Bill of Rights.
But I have found Rome rearing it's ugly head again. Using the same old inquisitional methods through these Child Welfare Agencies (CPS, DYFS, etc)
Anonymous charges can be brought against parents. The complaint usually comes via an "allegation" of "suspected" abuse. CPS or DYFS then will come to your home and demand entry to investigate. If you refuse they will often go and get a warrant from a judge and come with the police and force their way in.
Then, simply because you excercised your 4th amendment rights of not allowing an agency into your home, you are now under suspicion and you are then scrutinized all the more.
Then they can, if they deem neccessary, take your children under an emergency removal clause. This is at the sole discretion of the young (usually single and childless) social worker.
I have started looking into this and have found case after case of horrifying stories. I am making this one of my most important web pages to date.
There is nothing worse than what these agencies are doing. Not only do they steal children illegally. But when a child really is in danger, the agencies have often failed at helping them and they wind up dead or literally at death's door.
Also, notice how you don't see in the news, Catholic groups being investigated even though thousands of cases of pedophilia are coming up. When a lot of these cases were being made known the mainstream media were following Michael Jackson all around focusing only on him menawhile he was found innocent. Yet the catholic church were paying off all these victims totally in the billions of dollars.
I ask you to take this threat personally and please stand together with these victims. As the Lord says, "Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father also is merciful."
Luke 6:36
AUSTIN - Tarrant County District Judge Judith Wells improperly ignored a mother's objection when she awarded grandparents three days a month with the woman's 7-year-old child, the Texas Supreme Court decided June 27.
The justices unanimously directed Judge Wells to vacate a temporary visitation order she granted last year to Bobby Cook and Jamelia Cook.
The justices agreed that Judge Wells abused her discretion by reaching a decision without giving mother Stacy Chambless a meaningful opportunity to be heard.
Chambless formerly shared custody of the child with father Bobby Cook Jr., whose parents supervised his visitation. When a motorcycle accident killed Bobby Cook Jr., his parents petitioned for temporary visitation.
Judge Wells appointed social worker Rhonda Hopkins to the case. She reported that depriving the grandparents of access would be very detrimental to the child's emotion well being.
At a hearing, the Cooks introduced the report as evidence. Hopkins did not appear, so Chambless' attorney, Thomas Michel, could not cross examine her.
Michel argued that it would be in the child's best interest to deny visitation, but the judge did not allow him to present evidence.
Judge Wells signed an interim order granting the Cooks three days a month.
Chambless petitioned for a writ of mandamus at the Second District appeals court in Fort Worth, and the Second District denied relief.
Chambless appealed to the Texas Supreme Court, where she won mandamus relief.
According to the justices, the Texas family code presumes that a parent acts in the best interest of a child.
To overcome this presumption, they wrote, grandparents must prove that denial of access would significantly impair a child's physical health or emotional well being.
